Upper Mississippi River Restoration Program

Upper Mississippi River Restoration Program

Long Term Resource Monitoring


folder.gifLa Crosse field station

Cooperative Research

Heidi LangrehrHeidi Langrehr served as lead author on a peer-reviewed scientific paper with a diverse group of coauthors that included Dr. Brian Gray (USGS/UMESC) and Jeff Janvrin (WDNR, Mississippi River Team). The study evaluates aquatic vegetation response to an island-building habitat rehabilitation and enhancement project (HREP) in lower Pool 8, and includes data collected from Phase I and II of the Pool 8 Islands HREP as well as data from areas in lower Pool 8 that had no projects built. Results suggest island building is an effective tool to establish aquatic vegetation in impounded sections of the Mississippi River such as Lower Pool 8 where suitable fish and waterfowl habitat can otherwise be scarce relative to other areas of the river.

For further reading:
Langrehr, H. A., B. R. Gray, and J. A. Janvrin (2007) Evaluation of aquatic macrophyte community response to island construction in the Upper Mississippi River, Lake and Reservoir Management 23:313-320


Andy Bartels
Andy Bartels, a La Crosse Field Station Fisheries Specialist, uses a computerized imaging system to measure growth increments on the scales of bluegills, black crappies, and other selected fish species. Bartels and coworkers from the U.S. Geological Survey, the Illinois Natural History Survey, and the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse discovered that the bluegill, a species which tends to feed in vegetated areas along shoreline margins, grew more in flood years than in drought or normal years. This did not occur to such an extent with more open-water feeders such as white bass. The findings of Bartels and colleagues support the flood-pulse theory in river ecology. This theory states that certain organisms have evolved in an environment of intermittent flooding and depend on a moving shore-zone to exploit additional food resources of terrestrial origin available on the changing shoreline margins created by a flood.

For further reading, consult the following:

'Evaluation of the flood-pulse concept based on statistical models of growth of selected fishes of the upper Mississippi River System" published in Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Volume 56, pp. 2282-2291 (1999) by Steve Gutreuter (USGS-UMESC), Andy Bartels (WDNR-Onalaska), Kevin Irons (INHS-Havanna) and Mark Sanheinrich (UW-La Crosse).

samplingThe finer, EPA-approved wash-screen is stacked below the coarser test screen to recover macroinvertebrates in this study by Terry Dukerschein, La Crosse Field Station Team Leader, and coworkers from the Iowa DNR and the National Biological Survey (NBS is now USGS-UMESC). The study evaluated what we would lose if we converted to the coarser mesh size to save time washing sediment samples that contained aquatic macroinvertebrates. Screening and washing macroinvertebrates in the field can be time-consuming if the screen size used is too small for the substances being screened. An abundance of clay in some of our samples often clogged our wash screens. We found that using a slightly coarser mesh in our wash screens increased sampling efficiency and we were still able to recover most organisms we had before, with the exception of some very small juvenile fingernail clams. Since the scientific literature indicates that fingernail clams of the size in question are likely aborted from parents during the trauma of the wash process, we did not consider this a significant loss, and we converted to the coarser screen to save time sampling.

For further reading, consult the following:

'Recovery of macroinvertebrates by screening in the field: A comparison between coarse (1.18 mm)- and fine (0.60 mm)-mesh sieves' published in Journal of Freshwater Ecology 11(1):61- 65 (1996) By J. Therese Dukerschein (WDNR-Onalaska), Russ Gent (IDNR-Bellevue), and Jennifer Sauer (NBS).

Jim FischerAt an international conference on large rivers held in La Crosse in 1994, Jim Fischer, La Crosse Field Station water quality specialist, explains his research documenting declines of underwater aquatic plants in Pool 8 or the Upper Mississippi River between 1975 and 1991. Fischer did his research while he was a full time student at UW-La Crosse (River Studies Center), but his research was also funded by the Long Term Resource Monitoring element and final stages were supported by the WDNR's La Crosse Field Station--a good example of how multiple programs and agencies cooperate to get the job done.

For further reading, consult the following:

"Declines in aquatic vegetation in Navigation Pool No. 8, Upper Mississippi River between 1975 and 1991." Regulated Rivers: Research & Management 11:157-165 (1995). By James. R. Fischer, and Thomas. O. Claflin

Other supplemental research studies that La Crosse Field Station staff have participated in are described in the following Project Status Reports. Project Status Reports are internal Long Term Resource Monitoring documents whose purpose is to provide information on Program activities. Because these reports are only subject to internal peer review, they may not be cited (click on the titles below to read the Project Status Reports).

Dukerschein, J. T. and H. A. Langrehr. 2000. Distribution of wild rice (Zizania aquatica l.) before and after the flood of 1993 in Pool 8 of the Upper Mississippi River

Langrehr, H. A. and J. T. Dukerschein. 1998. Assessment of Aerial Photointerpretation for Detecting Submersed Aquatic Vegetation

Yin, Y. 1997. Estimating Inundation-Induced Tree Mortality Using River Water Level Data

Soballe, D., J. Rogala, J. R. Fischer. 1996. Water Level Changes Impact Winter Habitat


La Crosse Field Station Team Leader
Telephone: (608) 781-6360
Fax: (608) 783-6066

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

Take Pride in America logo USA.gov logo U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey

Page Last Modified: April 3, 2018 US Army Corps of Engineers USGS Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center US Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Minnesota DNR Wisconsin DNR Iowa DNR Illinois Natural History Survey Missouri DC April 3, 2018