Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center
SCOPES OF WORK FY 2001
For Implementation of the Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP)
Element of the Upper Mississippi River System- Environmental Management
Program
INTRODUCTION
Authorization
Project Location
Contract Objectives
MONITORING AND ANALYSIS
Aquatic Vegetation Component
Fisheries Component
Macroinvertebrate Component
Water Quality Component
Annual LTRMP Monitoring Summary Report
Fishery Resources of Deep Channels
Statistical Evaluation of Monitoring Data
Bathymetric Mapping for HREP Projects and Pool-wide Planning
APPLIED RESEARCH: LANDSCAPE & HABITAT ANALYSES
Year 2000 Land Cover/Land Use for key pools
Investigation of Remote Sensing Technology for Land Cover
APPLIED RESEARCH: INTEGRATED ANALYSES
Numerical and Statistical Modeling of Aquatic Plant Biomass
Integrated Analysis of Fish Monitoring Data
LTRMP Milestones
Requires Adobe Acrobat Reader
INTRODUCTION
Authorization
Section 1103(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C.
652(e)), Public Law 99-662, as amended (WRDA 1999)
Project Location
PL 99-662 as amended authorizes the LTRMP to monitor the entire UMRS.
The USGS conducts the program based at the Upper Midwest Environmental
Sciences Center (UMESC) in La Crosse, Wisconsin, and through 6 state-operated
field stations.
Contract Objectives
This is the contractual scope of work (SOW) for Military Interdepartmental
Purchase Requests (MIPRs) Numbers 96514793437938 (Federal) and 96514793637939
(Non-Federal). These MIPRs are issued to the U.S. Geological Survey -
Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center (USGS-UMESC) by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) for Fiscal Year 2001 (FY01) to conduct the
Long Term Resource Monitoring Program (LTRMP), an element of the Upper
Mississippi River System - Environmental Management Program (UMRS-EMP).
This SOW specifies FY01 work to be performed, products to be delivered,
milestones, and allocation of funding for the following activities:
- Monitoring and Analysis
- Applied Research: Landscape and habitat analyses
- Applied Research: Integrated analyses
- Information Transfer
- Program Development
This SOW contains specifications for portions of the FY01 base-funded LTRMP activity. The USGS - UMESC study plan proposals for the work elements are referred by title and in the list of references.
Execution of this scope of work will be monitored via joint Corps and USGS - UMESC quarterly In-Progress Reviews (IPRs) and through existing program coordination mechanisms (Environmental Management Program Coordinating Committee and LTRMP Analysis Team meetings).
MONITORING AND ANALYSIS
Monitoring of selected components of the UMRS ecosystem will be conducted to maintain continuity of LTRMP monitoring records and sampling capabilities. Monitoring will include sampling, data collection, quality checking of data, calculation of summary statistics, archiving of data, statistical analysis of spatial and temporal trends, interpretation of monitoring results, reports on monitoring results, and transfer of data and reports to others. A summary report of fiscal year 2001 monitoring results and interpretation of UMRS ecological conditions will be prepared by September 15, 2002.
Project Title: Aquatic Vegetation Component
One annual increment of stratified random sampling (SRS) of submersed
aquatic vegetation (SAV) will be conducted following the LTRMP study plan
and standard protocol (USGS 1999a, Yin et al. 1999).
Objectives
- Monitor one annual increment of aquatic vegetation in LTRMP study areas (UMR Pools 4, 8, 13, 26, LaGrange Pool on the Illinois River).
- Determine if there are differences in relative abundance and community composition of SAV between strata, within and between study areas.
- Determine if there have been changes in relative abundance and community composition of SAV from previous years of monitoring.
Methods
In FY01 vegetation will be sampled using the SRS protocol in Pools 4,
8, 13, 26, and La Grange. The vegetation transects located in selected
backwaters that were sampled annually from 1991 to 2000 will not be sampled.
SAV will be sampled from randomly located sites within five aquatic areas strata (SRS sampling) within each LTRMP study area except Open River: 1) main channel border, 2) secondary channels, 3) contiguous backwaters, 4) impounded areas, and 5) isolated backwaters. All sampling sites will be located in <2.5 ft of water depth below project pool elevation. The total number of SAV sampling sites will vary between LTRMP study areas: Pool 4 - 550, Pool 8 - 600, Pool 13 - 550, Pool 26 - 400, LaGrange - 500. Six sub-sampling areas will be visually inspected at each site, and vegetation will be collected with a rake. Data on species relative abundance/frequency of occurrence (0 - 6 scale), water depth, and sediment type will be recorded. Information on river discharge and water surface elevation will be obtained for all pools of the UMR using procedures documented in the LTRMP procedures manual.
Products
- Year 2000 SAV data will be quality checked and entered into the LTRMP monitoring database.
- Summary statistics of year 2000 SAV sampling data will be calculated and quality checked.
- Statistical analysis of year 2000 SAV data to detect differences between strata, pools, and previous monitoring years.
- A summary of results and interpretation of year 2000 SAV monitoring, to be included in the 2000 LTRMP Monitoring Summary Report.
- An annual increment in the LTRMP database of river discharge and water surface elevation.
Milestones
- December 29, 2000 - Complete YR2000 aquatic vegetation data quality checking and entry into the LTRMP database.
- March 30, 2001 - Complete statistical analyses of year 2000 aquatic vegetation data.
- April 30, 2001 - Complete DRAFT YR 2000 Aquatic Vegetation Monitoring Section of the LTRMP YR2000 Summary Report
- May 30, 2001 - Complete FINAL YR 2000 Aquatic Vegetation Monitoring Section of the LTRMP YR2000 Summary Report
- July 31, 2001 - Complete SAV stratified random sampling.
- September 30, 2001 - Complete adding annual increment to database of river discharge and elevation.
Total Funding: $832,900 (Federal 403,200 & Non-Federal 429,700)
Personnel
Dr. Yao Yin will be the principal investigator in charge of LTRMP aquatic
vegetation monitoring.
Project Title: Fisheries Component
One annual increment of stratified random sampling of fish will be conducted, following the LTRMP study plan and standard protocols (USGS 1999b, Gutreuter et al. 1995). The level of effort for fish monitoring in FY2001 and any changes to the sampling protocol will be determined in March 2001 following analysis of previous LTRMP fisheries data (see project "Integrated Analysis of Fish Monitoring Data).
Objectives
- Measure the relative abundance, community composition, and population structure of fishes within six LTRMP study areas in the UMRS (Pools 4, 8, 13, 26, and the Open River reach of the Upper Mississippi River and the La Grange Pool on the Illinois River).
- Determine if relative abundance, community composition, and population structure of fishes differ between strata, within study areas, and between study areas.
- Determine if the relative abundance, community composition, and population structure of fishes have changed from previous years of monitoring.
Methods
Fish will be sampled from randomly chosen locations from within aquatic
areas strata present within each LTRMP study area:
- Backwater, contiguous, offshore (BWCO)
- Backwater, contiguous, shoreline (BWCS)
- Main channel border, wing dam (MCBW)
- Main channel border, unstructured (MCBU)
- Impounded, offshore (IMPO)
- Impounded, shoreline (IMPS)
- Secondary channel border (SCB)
- Tributary mouth (TRI)
- Tailwater (TWZ)
Fish will be sampled with multiple sampling gears. In prior years, sampling has been done with electrofishing, fyke nets, seines, small fyke nets, hoop nets, and small trawls, following standard LTRMP protocols (Gutreuter et al. 1995). Sampling effort with passive gears (e.g., fyke nets and hoop nets) may be reduced in FY 2001, pending the consideration of recommendations to be derived from statistical analyses of the effectiveness of different gears in characterizing community composition and the relative abundance of key fish species. Fish sampling will be conducted during three time periods between June 15 and October 15 in each LTRMP study area.
Products
- Fish data will be quality checked and entered into the LTRMP monitoring database.
- Summary statistics of fish sampling will be calculated and quality checked.
- Statistical analysis to detect differences between strata, pools, and previous monitoring years will be conducted.
- A summary and interpretation of results of year 2000 fish monitoring, to be included in the 2000 LTRMP Monitoring Summary Report.
Milestones
- November 1, 2000 - Complete the third FY 2000 fish sampling effort (September 16-October 31, 2000)
- February 1, 2001 - Complete 2000 fish data quality checking and entry into the LTRMP database.
- March 31, 2001 - Complete summary statistics and statistical analyses of 2000 fish data.
- March 2001 - Decision date to determine fisheries sampling protocol for FY01.
- May 30, 2001 - Complete draft of 2000 fish monitoring section of the LTRMP YR2000 Monitoring Summary Report
- July 31, 2001 - Complete the first fish-sampling effort for the year 2001.
- September 15, 2001 - Complete the second year fish sampling effort for the year 2001.
Total Funding: $1,421,100 (Federal 434,900 & Non-Federal 986,200)
Personnel
Mr. Randy Burkhardt and Dr. Barry Johnson will be the principal investigators
in charge of LTRMP fish monitoring.
Project Title: Macroinvertebrate Component
One annual increment of macroinvertebrate sampling will be conducted, following the LTRMP study plan and standard protocols (USGS 1999c, Thiel and Sauer 1999). The sampling effort will be the same as that applied during prior years (1993 through 2000).
Objectives
- Measure the density and community composition of soft-substrate macroinvertebrates within six LTRMP study areas in the UMRS (Pools 4, 8, 13, 26, and the Open River reach on the Upper Mississippi River and the La Grange Pool on the Illinois River).
- Determine if macroinvertebrate density and community composition differ between strata within study areas and differ between study areas.
- Determine if macroinvertebrate density and community composition have changed from previous years of monitoring.
Methods
Benthic macroinvertebrates will be sampled by ponar dredge and screened
in the field. Samples will be preserved and retained for laboratory identification
and enumeration. Mayflies (Ephemeroptera), fingernail clams (Sphaeriidae),
Corbicula fluminea (Asiatic clam), midges (Chironomidae) and Dreissena
polymorpha (Zebra mussel) will be collected, identified, and enumerated.
The presence or absence of macroinvertebrates in the classes Odonata,
Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Diptera, Bivalvia, Oligochaeta, Decapoda, Amphipoda,
and Gastropoda will be observed and reported. Approximately 125 macroinvertebrate
samples will be collected in each study area. Sample allocation will be
based on a stratified random design, where strata include contiguous backwaters
(BWC), main channel borders (MCB), impounded areas (IMP), secondary channels
(SC), and tributary delta lake (TDL). All sites will be sampled in spring
to characterize the benthic community before the emergence of adult mayflies.
Pool-wide macroinvertebrate densities will be estimated by pooling data
over all strata.
Products
- Macroinvertebrate density and community composition data for the year 2000, quality checked and entered into the LTRMP monitoring database.
- Summary statistics of data on macroinvertebrate density and community composition, served via the UMESC web site.
- Statistical analyses of macroinvertebrate monitoring data for the year 2000.
- A summary and interpretation of results of year 2000 macroinvertebrate monitoring, to be included in the LTRMP Monitoring Summary Report for the year 2000.
Milestones
- January 31, 2001 - Complete quality checking of macroinvertebrate data for the year 2000, calculate summary statistics, and enter data into LTRMP database.
- March 31, 2001 - Complete statistical analyses of macroinvertebrate data from the year 2000.
- April, 30, 2001 - Complete draft of invertebrate monitoring section of the LTRMP YR2000 Summary Report
- July 31, 2001 - Complete macroinvertebrate sampling efforts in each LTRMP study area.
Total Funding: $217,600 (Federal 139,800 & Non-Federal 77,800)
Personnel
Ms. Jennie Sauer will be the principal investigator in charge of LTRMP
macroinvertebrate monitoring.
Project Title: Water Quality Component
One annual increment of LTRMP water quality monitoring will be conducted, following LTRMP protocols.
Objectives
- Measure selected limnological variables within six LTRMP study areas in the UMRS (including Pools 4, 8, 13, 26, and the Open River reach of the Upper Mississippi River and the La Grange Pool on the Illinois River) and in Pools 9, 12, and 14.
- Detect differences in water quality among strata within study areas and among study areas.
- Detect differences in water quality between sampling episodes.
- Determine changes in water quality over the LTRMP period of record.
- Complete internal USGS review and publish the LTRMP procedures manual for water quality monitoring.
Methods
A subset of limnological variables (physicochemical characteristics, suspended
sediment, and major plant nutrients) will be monitored at stratified-random
sites and at fixed locations within each LTRMP study area and at a number
of other selected sites. Data for Pool 9 is collected by Upper Iowa University
at no cost to LTRMP. Data in pools 12 and 14 are collected by the Bellevue
Field Station at the dams and at tributary confluences as outlined in
the water quality interim report. A combination of in-situ measurements
and grab samples retained for laboratory analysis will be collected. Allocation
of sampling effort will be based on four seasonal episodes each year for
the stratified-random sampling, and periodic (biweekly or monthly) sampling
at fixed sites. The sampling allocation will be the same as that used
in FY 2000. Water quality sampling and laboratory analyses will be performed
following standard LTRMP protocols. A procedures manual for the water
quality component, presently in final stages preparation, will be peer
reviewed and published.
Products
- Six data reports presenting detailed water-quality data for each of the six study areas during the years 1997-1999, available on the UMESC web site.
- Water-quality data, quality checked and entered into the LTRMP monitoring database from four water-sampling episodes during FY 2000.
- Summary statistics for year 2000 water quality data.
- Statistical analysis of year 2000 water quality data.
- A summary and interpretation of the results of year 2000 water quality monitoring, to be included in the LTRMP Monitoring Summary Report for the year 2000.
- A published Procedures Manual for LTRMP water quality monitoring.
Milestones
- October 22, 2000 Compete fall stratified random sampling episode at each of the six LTRMP field stations.
- December 31, 2000 Complete year 2000 water quality sampling at 2-week intervals.
- February 15, 2001 Complete winter stratified random sampling episode at each of the six LTRMP study areas.
- February 15, 2001 Complete winter stratified random sampling episode at each of the six LTRMP study areas.
- March 31, 2001 Complete error checking of 2000 water quality laboratory analyses.
- April 30, 2001 Complete calendar year 2000 water quality field data checking and entry to LTRMP database for fixed-site sampling and stratified random sampling.
- May 15, 2001 Complete spring stratified random sampling episode at each of the six LTRMP field stations.
- May 30, 2001 Complete transfer of calendar year 2000 analytical data from laboratory database to LTRMP database.
- June 30, 2001 Complete water quality section of the 2000 LTRMP monitoring summary report
- August 15, 2001 Complete summer stratified random sampling episode at each of the LTRMP field stations.
- September 28, 2001 Publish the LTRMP water quality Procedures Manual.
- September 28, 2001 Publish six data reports presenting detailed water-quality data for each of the six study areas during the years 1997-1999, on the UMESC web site.
Total Funding: $1,639,400 (Federal 866,200 & Non-Federal 773,200)
Personnel
Dr. David Soballe will be the principal investigator in charge of LTRMP
water quality monitoring.
Project Title: Annual LTRMP Monitoring Summary Report
A report summarizing LTRMP monitoring activities during the YR2000 and highlighting annual results will be prepared.
Objectives
Complete and distribute an annual report summarizing LTRMP monitoring
activities and interpreting ecological conditions in the UMRS during the
year 2000.
Methods
Results of year 2000 monitoring of UMRS hydrology, water quality, fish,
macroinvertebrates, and vegetation will be compiled. The report will include
selected summary statistics, analyses of spatial and temporal trends,
analyses long-term patterns, and a synthesis interpretation of ecological
conditions and sampling efforts during the year 2000.
Products
Annual monitoring summary report for the UMRS for the year 2000.
Milestones
September 30, 2001 - Final draft report completed and submitted for USGS
review distributed.
Total Funding: $86,100 Federal
Personnel
Drs. Carl Korschgen and Barry Johnson will be the lead UMESC principal
investigators responsible for the LTRMP annual monitoring report.
Project Title: Fishery Resources of Deep Channels
Biological production is a primary response of ecosystem processes, and is a primary object of both recreational and commercial fishing. High biological production is also thought to be a key mechanism that supports high species richness, so that production is also of direct importance to non-consumptive conservation efforts. Recent literature suggests that the fishery resources of rivers are more productive than those of lakes. However, there is considerable uncertainty in this conclusion because the fishery resources of large rivers, and particularly those of deep channels, are difficult to quantify.
Historic efforts to measure the abundance of riverine fishes, including past and ongoing standardized fish monitoring by the LTRMP, have been largely restricted to relatively shallow channel borders and back-waters that are easiest to sample. As a result, relatively little is known about the fishery resources of deep channels of the Mississippi River. That information gap is particularly problematic because the navigation channels of large rivers comprise a large fraction of the total aquatic area, and are a major zone of human impact by navigation and water regulation. Therefore, a better understanding of the fishery resources of these deep channels is critical, for example, to assess habitat requirements, to examine effects of anthropogenic stressors, and to manage fishery resources in large rivers. This project will complement traditional LTRMP fish monitoring by providing critical information on fishes that inhabit deeper channels that are not otherwise sampled.
This 5-year project will support integrated research on the fishery resources of the Upper Mississippi River system in support of management concerns. It is complementary to studies of effects of navigation on fishes funded by the Corps, and with new research funded by the USGS into managing pathways of biological production in large rivers and nutrient cycles in floodplains of large rivers.
Objectives
This project will address the two objectives, listed below, as part of
a planned 5-year course of study. An additional $157,000 in project funding,
beyond that listed below, will be required to fully implement Objective
1, and to collect an annual increment of data under Objective 2, below.
- Assess the efficiency of trawling for the estimation of abundance and biomass to provide estimates of abundance and biomass that are corrected for escapement from the gear.
- Quantify and model spatial and temporal patterns in abundance and biomass of fishes in deep channels and channel borders in relation to channel morphometry and bed slope, pool position, longitudinal gradient, season, and other factors that explain major modes of variation in abundance. Assess consequences of chronic disturbance in the navigation channels using comparisons of abundance between matched segments of navigation channel and morphometrically similar secondary channel and main channel border.
Methods
Objective 1 - Forward-scanning hydroacoustic trawling gear, and/or
videography and the feasibility of flume studies will be evaluated for
use in estimation of the fraction of fish that escape capture by the trawl.
Once an approach is selected, gear avoidance will be quantified, and correction
factors for escapement will be estimated.
Objective 2 - A probability-based spatially distributed sampling plan will be developed for trawl surveys. Trawl surveys, from throughout the UMR, will be conducted on an annual basis to estimate and model patterns in abundance and biomass of key fishes. Particular attention will be devoted to identification of potential effects of physical features, river control structures, hydraulic characteristics, and navigation on patterns of abundance and biomass. Abundance will be compared among matched segments of navigation channel, secondary channel, and main channel border to assess potential consequences of chronic disturbance.
Expected Products
- Quarterly progress reports (last days of December, March, June and September).
- Technical presentations at scientific conferences, to program partners, and to river managers.
- Publications in refereed journals.
Milestones in FY 2001
- May 31, 2001 - Evaluate the relative merits and efficacy of forward-scanning sonar, videography, and flume studies for estimation of the fraction of fish that escape capture by the trawl per Objective 1. Conduct a literature search and report findings in a quarterly progress report.
- June 29, 2001 - Evaluate alternatives for probability-based sampling designs for system-wide trawl surveys and report recommendations. Design study of comparison of matched segments of navigation channel, secondary channel, and main channel border to assess potential consequences of chronic disturbance. Report findings in a progress report.
Total Funding: $136,000 Federal
Personnel
Dr. Steve Gutreuter will be the lead principal investigator for the project.
Mr. Brent Knights and Mr. Steve Zigler will be co-investigators.
Project Title: Statistical Evaluation of Monitoring Data
Statistical analysis of LTRMP data will be intensified, and the effectiveness and efficiency of sampling designs for assessing trends and patterns in ecosystem components of the UMRS will be evaluated.
Objectives
This study will support more intensive statistical analyses of the LTRMP
component data and a more rigorous statistical examination of the program's
sampling framework. These activities are critically needed to guide scientifically
defensible modification or expansion of the program's monitoring and analysis
efforts. The first objective is to intensify statistical support for ongoing
and planned studies that involve synthesis, quantitative analysis, or
modeling of program data. The second objective is to complete a more rigorous
analysis of the LTRMP sampling framework.
The current program includes a number of ongoing studies and new investigations that involve synthesis, analysis, or modeling of LTRMP and other UMRS data. Other studies are critically examining the program's sampling framework or planning systemic analyses to characterize resources or habitats of the UMRS. Program partners have also recommended including investigations of other biotic groups, such as mussels, wildlife, and imperiled species, into the LTRMP resource-analysis framework. In particular, the design of sampling or research efforts for rare species of special interest to natural resource managers presents a major design challenge for the program.
These ongoing and planned efforts involve application of statistical theory and methodology for sampling design, estimation, hypothesis testing, and predictive modeling. Yet, the program presently lacks the requisite level of statistical support needed for consultation with LTRMP scientists, managers, and partners. The infusion of statistical expertise provided by this project will enhance the scientific defensibility and efficiency of LTRMP studies, will provide needed statistical input during programmatic planning efforts, and will facilitate the timely completion of planned products.
Methods
Statistical expertise will be acquired through cooperative agreements
and through recruiting of one or more professional-level statistician
positions (GS-11/12 appointment) and associated support staff at UMESC.
Objective 1 - Intensify statistical support for ongoing and planned studies that involve synthesis, quantitative analysis, or modeling of program data. Statistical guidance will be provided to LTRMP principal investigators at all appropriate stages of study planning and execution. Statistical consultations will include active participation in project planning, review of written study plans, critical evaluation of proposed and existing sampling designs, and provision of guidance on proposed methodologies for statistical estimation, hypothesis testing, and modeling.
Objective 2 - Complete a more rigorous analysis of the LTRMP sampling frame-work. More intensive analyses of LTRMP component data will be conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the program's existing sampling framework. The statistical analyses of redundancy in the component monitoring data will be much more comprehensive than that initiated in 1999.
The spatial adequacy of the existing monitoring program, which focuses on six fixed reaches of the UMRS, will also be examined. This effort will critically examine the present spatial allocation of effort (at the pool or reach scale), in comparison to a more systemic approach to component monitoring. Statistical analyses will also estimate the level of effort needed to meaningfully expand spatial coverage. The analyses completed thus far have not addressed a statistical sampling framework for expanding beyond the existing program reaches and have not critically examined the sampling framework with respect to its effectiveness for identifying linkages between system components, as well as cause-effect relationships.
This study plan represents an initial 1-year increment of work. Additional, sustained out-year effort will be required to provide the full level of statistical support needed for programmatic planning, critical evaluation of proposed and existing sampling designs, and statistical support of LTRMP projects.
Expected Products
- Recommendations for potential modifications of the LTRMP sampling framework for quantification and analysis of UMRS components.
- Project status reports.
- Technical presentations at scientific conferences, to program partners, and to river management groups concerning findings and interpretations.
- Publications in refereed journals, as appropriate.
Milestones
- March 30, 2001 - Status report of the types of analyses and likely applications for various LTRMP components.
- September 28, 2001 - Draft annual progress report of accomplishments, findings, and interpretations, including recommendations concerning the LTRMP sampling framework.
- Results, interpretations, and recommendations will be made available in scientific reports, presentations, and refereed publications.
Total Funding: $100,000 Federal
Personnel
Dr. Carl Korschgen will be the UMESC point of contact for this effort.
Project Title: Bathymetric mapping for HREP projects and analytical support for HREP projects and pool-wide planning
The proposed work is a focused effort of bathymetric surveys similar to those that LTRMP conducted since 1988. In the past, the LTRMP has assisted in collecting and analyzing bathymetric data at HREP project sites. This proposed work unit will formalize the critical function of bathymetric surveys in support of HREP design and monitoring. Staff will provide analytical support for HREP planning, including pool-wide planning whenever data is available. The GIS coverages created by this work unit will increase the spatial coverage of existing bathymetric data and result in progress towards the goal of a systemic bathymetric coverage. Staff will also develop a strategic plan for completion of a systemic bathymetric database, in anticipation for bathymetric surveys funded as an LTRMP over-target project.
Objectives
The short-term objective is to provide bathymetric data for design and
evaluation of HREP project sites. In the long-term, these data will expedite
the completion of a systemic GIS bathymetry data set for the UMRS. Provide
analytical support for HREP activities. Develop a strategic plan in coordination
with the USACE for collection and compilation of systemic bathymetry,
in preparation for increased funding levels.
Methods
No major changes to the existing methodology used in the past by LTRMP
are anticipated. However, in many cases, the data will be collected at
a greater resolution than is needed for the pool-wide mapping in order
to meet the needs of HREP planning and evaluation. The data collection
methods will be designed to produce data suitable for generating a pool-wide
GIS coverage using interpolation between sample points. The partners in
the HREP will define survey needs in the three USACE Districts of the
UMRS. A prioritization process will be directed by the regional EMP Program
Manager (MVR) in consultation with staff from the three UMRS Corps districts
and USGS management team.
Products
- Post-processed data and Arc/Info GIS coverages (grids and shapefiles).
- Standard set of products (i.e. data, images) for completed pools available through the UMESC bathymetry web pages.
- Additional hardcopy and electronic information, as requested.
- GIS analytical support, as requested.
Milestones
- December 29, 2000 - Complete prioritization of HREP bathymetry support.
- January 26, 2000 - Complete strategic plan for collection and compilation of systemic bathymetry.
- April 1, 2001 - Initiate bathymetry acquisition in support of HREP.
- August 31, 2001 - Complete bathymetric surveys that were requested.
- September 29, 2001 - Complete update of the UMESC bathymetry web pages.
Total Funding: $300,000 Federal
Personnel
Mr. Jim Rogala will be the UMESC principal investigator in charge of bathymetric
surveys and GIS database generation.
APPLIED RESEARCH: LANDSCAPE AND HABITAT ANALYSES
A variety of LTRMP applied research efforts will be conducted, designed to assess habitat conditions and habitat forming processes in the UMRS, document historic changes in the UMRS landscape, and to develop predictive tools to aid in planning for river management.
Project Title: Year 2000 Land Cover/Land Use and Aquatic Areas GIS Database
Development of a new Land Cover/Land Use and aquatic areas GIS database would provide an 11-year time step since the 1989 systemic coverage. Once completed this dataset would be invaluable in assessing and evaluating long-term vegetation trends, and habitat changes, in addition to documenting the current state. This umbrella scope of work spans multi-fiscal years with project funding derived from both program base and over-target funds.
Objectives
- Obtain a complete set of late summer aerial photography for the UMRS aquatic and floodplain areas in True Color and Color Infrared.
- Develop a new Year 2000 LCU and aquatic areas GIS database for the entire UMRS.
Methods
Aerial photographs of the entire UMRS were collected in color infrared
(CIR) and True Color (TC) in July, August and September of 2000 at 1:24,000
and 1:16,000 scales respectively. The TC aerial photos will be scanned,
rectified, mosaicked, compressed, and served via the UMESC Internet site.
The CIR aerial photos will be interpreted and automated using a 31-class
LTRMP vegetation classification (see Attachment A). The resulting LCU
datasets will be reclassified using the LTRMP aquatic areas classification
(see Attachment B). Year 2000 land cover/land use and aquatic areas GIS
databases will be prepared by or under the supervision of competent and
trained professional staff using documented standard operated procedures
and will be subject to rigorous quality control (QC) assurances (NBS,
1995). The LTRMP study areas (Pools 4, 8, 13, 26, the southern Open River
reach, and the La Grange Pool of the Illinois River) will be processed
first.
- Systemic Flight of UMRS - Fly the entire UMRS in CIR at 1:24,000 and
in TC at 1:16,000. Systemic aerial photography was collected in 1989
and 1994. The photos for 1989 are being interpreted and converted to
a land cover/land use (LCU) database. Some pools from 1994 have been
converted and preliminary analysis indicates that a five-year differential
is too short to detect many changes that may be occurring. Another systemic
flight would provide the opportunity to generate an eleven-year differential
LCU database and would provide the basis for both long-term change detection
and better assessment of the 1993 flood impact on vegetation.
- Scan, Rectify, Mosaic, and Serve the 2000 TC Aerial Photography -
UMESC has the capability to compress and mosaic high-resolution (2-3
meter) scans of the proposed systemic flight. These georeferenced photos
would provide a base map on which existing LCU data and future LCU data
could be overlaid. These photos also offer the ability to do visual-based
land use or habitat analysis that digital orthophotos can't provide
since they are created from black-and-white aerial photographs collected
in spring. These photos would be made available, by pool or reach, through
UMESC's internet home page.
- Key Pool Automation of 2000 Systemic Aerial Photography - Begin key pool (Pools 4, 8, 13, 26, the southern Open River reach, and the La Grange Pool of the Illinois River) interpretation of the 2000 UMRS systemic aerial photography using a 31-class vegetation classification system and the LTRMP aquatic areas classification (see Attachments A & B). Year 2000 land cover/land use and aquatic areas GIS databases will be prepared by or under the supervision of competent and trained professional staff using documented standard operated procedures and will be subject to rigorous quality control (QC) assurances (NBS, 1995). The LTRMP study areas (Pools 4, 8, 13, 26, the southern Open River reach, and the La Grange Pool of the Illinois River) will be processed first.
Products
Completed in FY2000
Task A: A complete set of late summer aerial photography (prints
and transparencies) acquired for the entire UMRS floodplain in TC and
CIR.
Over-Target funded in FY2000 $311,000
FY 2001
Task B: Georeferenced digital TC photo mosaics for each LTRMP study area on the UMRS (key pools and river reaches), served via the UMESC Internet site.
Key Pools: Pools 4, 8, 13, 26; Open River South; Illinois River - La Grange Pool Over-Target funded in FY2000 $75,000
Non-key pools: Pools 1-3, 5-7, 9-12, 14-25; Open River North;
Illinois River Pools - Alton, Peoria, Starved Rock, Marseilles, Dresden,
Brandon, and Lockport
Over-Target submission in FY2001 $75,000
Task C: Automation of 2000 LCU datasets for key pools (Pools 4,
8, 13, 26; Open River South; Illinois River - La Grange Pool), served
via the UMESC Internet site.
Base program funded in FY2001: $216,000
Task D: Automation of 2000 LCU datasets for non-key pools, served
via the UMESC Internet site.
Over-Target submission in FY2001 $900,000 Total
Estimated costs:
- Alton Pool $150,000
- Peoria-Lockport Pools$150,000
- Pools 9-12 $130,000
- Pools 14-19 $125,000
- Pools 5-7 $ 80,000
- Pools 20-25 $125,000
- Open River North $100,000
- Pools 1-3, St, Croix $ 40,000
Task E: Automation of 2000 Aquatic Areas datasets for entire UMRS,
served via the UMESC Internet site.
Over-Target submission in FY2001 $150,000
Milestones
- February 28, 2001 - Complete georeferenced photo mosaics of LTRMP key pools (Task-B).
- March 31, 2001 - Complete 2000 databases for UMR Pool 8 and La Grange Pool (Task-C).
- June 30, 2001 - Complete 2000 databases for UMR Pool 26 and southern Open River (Task-C)
- August 31, 2001 - Complete 2000 databases for UMR Pools 4 and 13. (Task-C)
Total Funding: $ 216,000 Federal
$ 1,125,000 Over-Target Submission
Personnel
Mr. Larry Robinson will be the UMESC principal investigator in charge
of developing the Year 2000 land use/land cover and aquatic areas GIS
databases for the UMRS.
ATTACHMENT A
LTRMP 31-Class General Vegetation Classification, Version 1.0
CODE |
CODE DESCRIPTION |
HYDRO |
HYDROLOGY DESCRIPTION |
NVCS |
NVCS DESCRIPTION |
OW |
Open Water |
1 |
Permanently Flooded Non-Forest |
n/a |
Open Water; Default to Anderson Classification |
RFA |
Rooted Floating Aquatics |
1 |
Permanently Flooded Non-Forest |
V.C.2.N.a. |
Permanently flooded temperate or subpolar hydromorphic rooted vegetation |
SV |
Submerged Aquatic Vegetation |
1 |
Permanently Flooded Non-Forest |
V.C.2.N.a. |
Permanently flooded temperate or subpolar hydromorphic rooted vegetation |
DMA |
Deep Marsh Annual |
2 |
Semipermanently Flooded Non-Forest |
V.A.5.N.l. |
Semipermanently flooded temperate or subpolar grassland |
DMP |
Deep Marsh Perennial |
2 |
Semipermanently Flooded Non-Forest |
V.A.5.N.l. |
Semipermanently flooded temperate or subpolar grassland |
MUD |
Mud |
3 |
Seasonally Flooded Non-Forest |
VII.C.4.N.c. |
Seasonally/Temporarily flooded mudflats |
SMA |
Shallow Marsh Annual |
3 |
Seasonally Flooded Non-Forest |
V.A.5.N.k. |
Seasonally flooded temperate or subpolar grassland |
SMP |
Shallow Marsh Perennial |
3 |
Seasonally Flooded Non-Forest |
V.A.5.N.k. |
Seasonally flooded temperate or subpolar grassland |
SM |
Sedge Meadow |
4 |
Temporarily Flooded Non-Forest |
V.A.5.N.j. |
Temporarily flooded temperate or subpolar grassland |
WM |
Wet Meadow |
5 |
Saturated Soil Non-Forest |
V.A.5.N.m. |
Saturated temperate or subpolar grassland |
DMS |
Deep Marsh Shrub |
6 |
Semipermanently Flooded Shrubs |
III.B.2.N.f. |
Semipermanently flooded cold-deciduous shrubland |
SMS |
Shallow Marsh Shrub |
7 |
Seasonally Flooded Shrubs |
III.B.2.N.e. |
Seasonally flooded cold-deciduous shrubland |
WMS |
Wet Meadow Shrub |
8 |
Temporarily Flooded Shrubs |
III.B.2.N.d. |
Temporarily flooded cold-deciduous shrubland |
SS |
Shrub/Scrub |
9 |
Infrequently Flooded Shrubs |
III.B.2.N.a. |
Temperate cold-deciduous shrubland |
WS |
Wooded Swamp |
10 |
Semipermanently Flooded Forest |
I.B.2.N.f. |
Semipermanently flooded cold-deciduous closed tree canopy |
FF |
Floodplain Forest |
11 |
Seasonally Flooded Forest |
I.B.2.N.e. |
Seasonally flooded cold-deciduous closed tree canopy |
PC |
Populus Community |
11 |
Seasonally Flooded Forest |
I.B.2.N.e. |
Seasonally flooded cold-deciduous closed tree canopy |
SC |
Salix Community |
11 |
Seasonally Flooded Forest |
I.B.2.N.e. |
Seasonally flooded cold-deciduous closed tree canopy |
BHF |
Bottomland Hardwood Forest |
12 |
Temporarily Flooded Forest |
I.B.2.N.d. |
Temporarily flooded cold-deciduous closed tree canopy |
CN |
Conifers |
13 |
Infrequently Flooded Forest |
I.A.8.N.b. |
Rounded-crowned temperate or subpolar needle-leaved evergreen forest |
PN |
Plantation |
13 |
Infrequently Flooded Forest |
I.A.8.C.a. |
Plantation |
UF |
Upland Forest |
13 |
Infrequently Flooded Forest |
I.B.2.N.a. |
Lowland or submontane cold-deciduous closed tree canopy |
AG |
Agriculture |
14 |
Infrequently Flooded Non-Forest |
V.C.2.N.b. |
Annual row-crop forbs or grasses |
DV |
Developed |
14 |
Infrequently Flooded Non-Forest |
n/a |
Developed; Default to Anderson Classification |
GR |
Grassland |
14 |
Infrequently Flooded Non-Forest |
V.A.5.N.a. |
Tall sod temperate grassland |
LV |
Levee |
14 |
Infrequently Flooded Non-Forest |
n/a |
Levee; Default to Anderson Classification |
PS |
Pasture |
14 |
Infrequently Flooded Non-Forest |
V.A.5.C.a. |
Perennial Grass Crops |
RD |
Roadside Grass/Forbs |
14 |
Infrequently Flooded Non-Forest |
n/a |
Roadside Grass/Forb; Default to Anderson Classification |
SB |
Sand Bar |
4 |
Temporarily Flooded Non-Forest |
VII.C.1.N.a. |
Temporarily flooded sand flats |
SD |
Sand |
14 |
Infrequently Flooded Non-Forest |
VII.C.1.N.a. |
Dunes with sparse herbaceous vegetation |
NPC |
No Photo Coverage |
n/a |
n/a |
No Photo Coverage; n/a |
VEGETATION MODIFIERS
Density A = 10-33% B = 33-66% C = 66-90% D = > 90%
Height* 1 = 0-20 ft. 2 = 20-50 ft. 3 = > 50 ft. *Trees only
ATTACHMENT B
Aquatic Areas Classification
CODE |
CODE DESCRIPTION |
MC |
Main Channel |
MNC |
Main Channel-Navigation Channel |
MCB |
Main Channel-Channel Border |
SC |
Secondary Channel |
SNC |
Secondary Channel-Navigation Channel |
SCB |
Secondary Channel-Channel Border |
TC |
Tertiary Channel |
TRC |
Tributary Channel |
SB |
Sandbar |
CACL |
Contiguous Floodplain Lake-Abandoned Channel Lake |
CTDL |
Contiguous Floodplain Lake-Tributary Delta Lake |
CLLL |
Contiguous Floodplain Lake-Lateral Levee Lake |
CSCL |
Contiguous Floodplain Lake-Scour Channel Lake |
CFDL |
Contiguous Floodplain Lake-Floodplain Depression Lake |
CMML |
Contiguous Floodplain Lake-Manmade Lake |
CBP |
Contiguous Floodplain Lake-Borrow Pit |
CFSA |
Contiguous Floodplain Shallow Aquatic Area |
CIMP |
Contiguous Impounded Area |
IACL |
Isolated Floodplain Lake-Abandoned Channel Lake |
ITDL |
Isolated Floodplain Lake-Tributary Delta Lake |
ILLL |
Isolated Floodplain Lake-Lateral Levee Lake |
ISCL |
Isolated Floodplain Lake-Scour Channel Lake |
IFDL |
Isolated Floodplain Lake-Floodplain Depression Lake |
IMML |
Isolated Floodplain Lake-Manmade Lake |
IBP |
Isolated Floodplain Lake-Borrow Pit |
IFSA |
Isolated Floodplain Shallow Aquatic Area |
CD |
Closing Dam |
WD |
Wing Dam |
RB |
Revetted Bank |
N |
Non-Aquatic Area |
NOPH |
No Photo Coverage |
EC |
Excavated Channel |
Project Title: Investigation of Remote Sensing Technology for Land Cover
A land cover/land use GIS database for nearly the entire UMRS has been created through interpretation of 1:15,000 scale aerial photography acquired in 1989. It would be time- and cost-prohibitive to produce a more current, system-wide land cover/land use dataset at the same level of classification detail and using the same protocol. Technologies and classification for a new systemic UMRS land cover/land use and aquatic areas database will be examined, and a process recommended.
Objective
The objective is to determine an improved method for developing the land
cover/land use GIS dataset for the UMRS. The alternatives to be explored
include using smaller scale aerial photography, which would significantly
reduce the number of photos to be interpreted; or using the most recent,
digitally-based technologies, which allow a more automated development
of the LCU as well as direct incorporation into a GIS.
Initially, three study areas representative of the UMRS will be used in the evaluation. The study areas are each approximately 100km2. They are located in Pools 8 and 22 of the Upper Mississippi River and in the LaGrange Pool of the Illinois River. Aerial photography and satellite (IKONOS) images were acquired for all three study areas in the first year (FY00) of the study. Airborne hyperspectral (AISA) data will be acquired during the second year. The high cost of AISA data will limit FY01 acquisitions to only the LaGrange Pool. Pool 8 (and possibly Pool 22) would be acquired if additional funds become available, or acquisition costs prove to be lower than initial estimates.
Methods
Smaller scale (1:24,000) aerial photography, 4-meter cell resolution multispectral
satellite (IKONOS) images, and airborne hyperspectral (AISA) imagery will
be assessed for their utility in classifying land cover types along several
stretches of the UMRS. In addition, a literature review will be conducted
to determine applications of current remote sensing technology to large
river floodplain mapping.
Aerial photography (1:15,000 and 1:24,000) and the IKONOS images will be acquired in the late summer of 2000 for portions of Pools 8 and 22 of the UMRS and for a portion of the LaGrange Pool of the Illinois River. All sets of remotely sensed data will be interpreted to a 31-class LCU scheme. It is assumed the larger (1:15,000) scale photography will allow sufficiently accurate interpretation at the 31-class level, so the resulting LCU layer will be the reference layer against which the 1:24,000 photo-interpretation and the IKONOS classification are compared.
AISA image(s) will be acquired in the late summer of 2001, and interpreted to the same 31-class LCU scheme. Aerial photography (1:15,000) will be re-acquired to provide concurrent reference data for the AISA classification.
A literature review will be conducted on the utility of satellite-based and airborne sensors for detecting floodplain cover types. The review will focus on recent studies that present quantified (e.g., contingency tables) not qualified (e.g. "this sensor appears promising") results. Where the technology is too new to have generated peer-reviewed literature, it will be evaluated on the basis of technological potential, cost, and logistics (e.g. scheduling constraints).
Products
- A set of 1:24,000 CIR aerial photographs of selected study areas collected in August.
- Four LCU datasets based on the 1:15,000 and 1:24,000 aerial photography and multi-/hyperspectral data will be produced for the study areas.
- A brief report will document the protocols used and evaluate the 1:24,000 dataset based on accuracy and production time.
- A review of recent literature describing applications of digitally-based sensors for mapping floodplain LCU and the cover types they are capable of mapping accurately. Comparisons of practical advantages and disadvantages of each sensor.
- An accuracy assessment of the LCU classifications derived from year 2000, 4-meter multispectral, satellite (IKONOS) data, year 2001, and hyperspectral airborne (AISA) data.
- A Project Status Report for each of the two (IKONOS and AISA) digitally-based classifications.
Milestones
- January 31, 2001 - The literature review and study area photo interpretation will be completed.
- May 31, 2001 - The comparison and assessment of the IKONOS satellite imagery will be completed.
- June 30, 2001 - Project status report on the IKONOS classification
- September 30, 2001 - Acquisition of AISA hyperspectral imagery
- December 31, 2001 - The comparison and assessment of the AISA hyperspectral imagery
- January 31, 2002 - Project status report on the AISA classification
- February 28, 2002 - Final Report with recommendations
Total Funding: $ 80,000 (Federal $ 55,000 & COE Contract Est. $ 25,000)
Personnel
Pete Joria will be the UMESC principal investigator in charge of research
on new methods for developing land use/land cover data for the UMRS.
APPLIED RESEARCH: INTEGRATED ANALYSIS
Project Title: Numerical and statistical modeling of aquatic plant biomass
American wildcelery (Vallisneria Americana) and sago pondweed (Potomogeton pectinatus) represent a substantial proportion of the submersed aquatic plant community in the UMRS and are important to fish and wildlife species. Plant ecologists at the COE Waterways Experiment Station developed numerical models (Best, E. P.H., and W.A. Boyd. 2000. VALLA (Version 1.0): a simulation model for growth of American wildcelery. Instruction report E-2000 In press. Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg, MS) for American wildcelery and sago pondweed which predict production of biomass. We will further develop this modeling approach to make the models spatially explicit by incorporating existing environmental data (climate, water depth, water transparency ) into a spatial platform for 2 to 3 UMR Pools for which relevant input data sets exist.
Objectives
The objective of the work is to develop and evaluate numerical and statistical
models of American wildcelery and sago pondweed biomass. Models will allow
ability to predict annual productivity of these two species, in terms
of plant, seed, and tuber biomass, and their potential to maintain presence
in subsequent years.
Methods
To develop and refine these models, the following input data will be compiled:
site-specific environmental information, plant species and initial biomass
(above ground leaves and seeds and below ground tubers/turions). Field
data are currently available from previous or ongoing studies through
LTRMP, UMESC, or WES programs. If data availability is sufficient, generative
propagation will be incorporated into the most recent model versions.
The models will be used to quantify effects of temporal changes in variables
such as climate (latitude, irradiance, and temperature), water depth,
water transparency, and biomass removal (due to herbivory, mechanical
harvesting, or extreme wave action, as examples) on plant biomass dynamics
over 1- to 5-year periods. The models will be useful in evaluating effects
of both past and future changes in environmental conditions on plant biomass
and survival. An analysis of the sensitivity of these models to changes
in the environmental data will be used to evaluate consequences of changes
in (river) management for biomass and persistence of these species.
Another model incorporating empirical/statistical analyses will be developed on a spatially defined grid (GIS). Using this model the spatial distribution of wildcelery and sago pondweed will be projected as a probabilistic event in terms of presence or absence, with and without abundance as a weighting factor. Variables in the model will include water depth, water transparency, total suspended solids, current velocity, wind fetch, and sediment type. Potential habitat will be projected (from the past), by this modeling approach which generates spatial presence or absence information, with and without probability assessment.
The outcomes of both the numerical and statistical modeling approaches will be evaluated to determine potential effects of UMRS management on distribution, biomass production and persistence of American wildcelery and sago pondweed. Products will be especially relevant for establishing goals and evaluating future HREPs and for future integration with other LTRMP components and other fish and wildlife studies.
Products
- A UMESC/WES Project Status Report will be written describing progress made during FY2000.
- Two technical reports will be written, one on statistical model development (UMESC), and one comparing the outcomes of both the numerical and statistical modeling approaches (UMESC/WES). The latter report will include recommendations pertaining to river management, information needs, and monitoring of submersed aquatic vegetation.
Milestones
- December 29, 2000 - Status Report of FY00 Accomplishments
- June 30 -- two technical draft reports on results of statistical model development and numeric model results.
- September 29, 2001 - Final technical reports as specified above will be completed and manuscripts prepared for internal peer review.
Total Funding: $100,000 Federal
Personnel
Dr. Yao Yin will be the UMESC principal investigator, Mr. Jim Rogala,
and Mr. Kevin Kenow will be UMESC co-investigators. Dr. E.P.H. Best will
be the WES principal investigator.
Project Title: Integrated Analysis of Fish Monitoring Data
Ten years of LTRMP fish monitoring data, collected during 1990-1999, will be analyzed to assess changes in the abundances and population structure of key fishes in the UMRS, to examine differences in fish resources between habitat areas and between Program study areas, to assess the influences of environmental conditions on the fish community, and to critically examine the design of the fish monitoring program. This is the second year of a multi-year effort. During the first year of this project (FY 2000), we compared abundances of key fish species within and among LTRMP study areas and examined fish community richness, evenness, and diversity metrics within and among study areas. In FY 2001 we will concentrate on using analyses from FY2000 and further analysis of fish assemblages sampled by gear types to make recommendations regarding fish sampling procedures for FY2001. In additions, we will address objectives 6 and 7 to begin integrating LTRMP data and analyses across components.
Objectives (FY 2001 and Out-Years)
- Compile and synthesize fisheries data collected during 1990-1999 at six LTRMP trend analysis areas of the UMRS. Analyses will focus largely on systemic trends of fish populations considered by UMRS resource managers as "key species" because of their commercial or recreational value.
- Analyze fish community dynamics (species richness, evenness, and diversity) at the aquatic habitat, pool, reach, and UMRS scales. The LTRMP fisheries component sampling design employs multiple gear types in a variety of aquatic habitat types to annually assess entire fish communities, facilitating these types of analyses.
- Compile and synthesize usable fisheries data collected by Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, and Wisconsin natural resource agencies.
- Compare LTRMP fish component data to similar fisheries data collected by states' natural resource agencies to determine if trends are similar among sampling programs and designs.
- Develop ecological indicators of large river health based on UMRS fish communities. Metrics to be produced will be habitat specific, to obtain an annual comprehensive evaluation of the integrity of each LTRMP trend analysis area.
- Compile and synthesize environmental data from other LTRMP components for discrete habitats of LTRMP trend analysis areas. Habitats will include specific main channel areas, side channels, and backwaters.
- Correlate biotic and abiotic environmental variability with seasonal and annual variation in fish populations in specific UMRS habitats. Integrative multivariate statistical analyses will be used to relate LTRMP fish component data to that of other components, including bathymetry, hydrology, vegetation, and water quality.
Methods
Mean catch-per-unit-effort (CPUE) of economically important UMRS fish
species will be used as an index of relative abundance. Statistically
valid comparisons of CPUE will be made to examine spatial variability
(among habitat types and trend analysis areas) and temporal variability
(among seasonal sampling periods and years). Fish community structure
will be described with indices of species richness, evenness, and diversity.
Fish data from states' natural resources agencies will be obtained and
statistically compared to LTRMP data. Development of ecological indicators
of river health will follow methods of national specialists. Compilation
of habitat specific environmental factors will be done in consultation
with LTRMP component specialists. Correlation of fish CPUE with environmental
factors will be accomplished with multivariate statistics.
Expected Products
- Project status reports to highlight key findings and to rapidly communicate project results.
- Annual progress reports, made available through the UMESC internet homepage.
- Technical presentations at scientific conferences, to Program partners, and to river management groups.
- Publications in refereed scientific journals, as appropriate.
Milestones for FY 2001
- March 2001 Submit recommendation and justification for FY01 fish sampling protocol.
- August 15, 2001 Complete draft annual progress report for USGS review.
- September 28, 2001 Complete draft project status report.
Total Funding: $144,900 Federal
Personnel
Mr. Brian Ickes and Drs. Barry Johnson and Steve Gutreuter will be the
principal investigators in charge of integrated analysis of LTRMP fish
monitoring data.
Page Last Modified: April 17, 2018